Financhill
Buy
79

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$120.86
Seasonality move :
4.87%
Day range:
$109.00 - $126.15
52-week range:
$35.56 - $133.67
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
32.32x
P/S ratio:
1.49x
P/B ratio:
7.40x
Volume:
8.3M
Avg. volume:
3.9M
1-year change:
235.13%
Market cap:
$14B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.74

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica
$2.5B $1.06 16.08% 31.54% $136.13
DELL
Dell Technologies
$24.6B $2.51 10.05% 52.74% $151.14
HPQ
HP
$13.3B $0.74 1.25% 19.56% $36.19
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$4.1M -$4.98 118.73% -99.59% --
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
-- -- -- -- --
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$1.3B $3.94 30.64% 1173.01% $420.60
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica
$120.88 $136.13 $14B 32.32x $0.00 0% 1.49x
DELL
Dell Technologies
$100.09 $151.14 $70.1B 17.52x $0.45 1.78% 0.77x
HPQ
HP
$32.00 $36.19 $30B 11.39x $0.29 3.49% 0.59x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$4.65 -- $1.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.28x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$2.22 -- $10.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.03x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$386.09 $420.60 $19.9B 52.53x $0.00 0% 4.30x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica
29.59% 1.798 7.43% 0.83x
DELL
Dell Technologies
110.05% 0.905 28.8% 0.43x
HPQ
HP
115.85% 1.536 28.99% 0.40x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
26.36% -1.735 122.04% 0.36x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
50.16% 11.504 426.14% 0.18x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
38.8% 0.605 11.36% 0.89x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica
$297.2M $204.7M 16.94% 24.71% 7.91% $27.3M
DELL
Dell Technologies
$5.3B $1.7B 17.81% -- 7.06% $914M
HPQ
HP
$3B $1.1B 33.28% -- 7.18% $1.5B
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$1.7M -$3.8M -197.89% -252.61% -1.69% -$7.6M
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.6M -$1.9M -193.52% -275.7% -57.72% -$1.1M
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$613M $196M 7.12% 11.99% 14.34% $277M

Celestica vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or DELL?

    Dell Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 4.65%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    21.78% $1.58 $22.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.61%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $151.14 which suggests that it could grow by 51%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    5 1 0
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    13 3 0
  • Is CLS or DELL More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.606%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 33.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or DELL?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $24.4B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.49x versus 0.77x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.49x 32.32x $2.5B $151.7M
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    0.77x 17.52x $24.4B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or HPQ?

    HP has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.45%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat HP's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    HPQ
    HP
    21.35% $0.93 $8.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.61%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $36.19 which suggests that it could grow by 13.11%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    5 1 0
    HPQ
    HP
    2 12 1
  • Is CLS or HPQ More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.153%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than HP's net income of $906M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while HP's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.49x versus 0.59x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.49x 32.32x $2.5B $151.7M
    HPQ
    HP
    0.59x 11.39x $14.1B $906M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or SYTA?

    Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -10.68%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    29.04% -$0.22 $13.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.61%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26902.52%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    5 1 0
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0 1 0
  • Is CLS or SYTA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.57%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.49x versus 0.28x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.49x 32.32x $2.5B $151.7M
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0.28x -- $5.9M -$626.3K
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or UAVS?

    AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    49.75% -$16.03 $12.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.61%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 744.59%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    5 1 0
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is CLS or UAVS More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.45%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.49x versus 0.03x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.49x 32.32x $2.5B $151.7M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0.03x -- $3.3M -$3.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or ZBRA?

    Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.92%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 11.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    48.85% $2.64 $5.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.61%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $420.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.94%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than Zebra Technologies, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than Zebra Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    5 1 0
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    8 10 0
  • Is CLS or ZBRA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Zebra Technologies's net income of $137M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 52.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.49x versus 4.30x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.49x 32.32x $2.5B $151.7M
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    4.30x 52.53x $1.3B $137M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Qualcomm Stock Going Up?
Why Is Qualcomm Stock Going Up?

Why Is Qualcomm Stock Going Up? QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM) share price…

Why Is TJX Stock Going Up?
Why Is TJX Stock Going Up?

Off-price retailer The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TJX) is having a…

Why Is Intuitive Surgical Stock Surging?
Why Is Intuitive Surgical Stock Surging?

Surgeries are scary for lots of reasons, not least because…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
38
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 98x

Alerts

Buy
58
EXOD alert for Feb 4

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.35% over the past day.

Buy
69
IDXX alert for Feb 4

IDEXX Laboratories [IDXX] is down 1.13% over the past day.

Sell
48
OKLO alert for Feb 4

Oklo [OKLO] is down 0% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock